Sunday, November 11, 2012

Calvinists, Would Calvin Approve Of Your Worship?

I have always been puzzled by those who loudly and proudly call themselves Calvinists, yet on an issue that he believed to be of the utmost importance and one of the great causes of the Reformation, they repudiate him. They like to talk about God's sovereignty but seem to give that no thought when it comes to how the people of God are to worship that sovereign. Many are, by all appearance's, Calvinistic in their soteriology, but everywhere else, functional charismatics at best.

John Calvin, addressing Emperor Charles the Fifth in, The Necessity of Reforming the Church, explained what acceptable worship is to God in 1554, in a way that seems almost prescient today.

...the rule which distinguishes  between pure and vitiated worship, is of universal application, in order that we not adopt any device which seems fit to ourselves, but look to the injunctions of Him who alone is entitled to prescribe. Therefore, if we would have Him approve our worship, this rule, which he every where enforces with the utmost strictness, must be carefully observed. For there is a two-fold reason why the Lord, in condemning and prohibiting all fictitious worship, requires us to give obedience only to his own voice. First, it tends greatly to establish His authority that we do not follow our own pleasure, but depend entirely on his sovereignty; and secondly, such is our folly, that when we are left at liberty, all we are able to do is to go astray. And then when once we have turned aside from the right path, there is no end to our wanderings, until we get buried under a multitude of superstitions. Justly, therefore, does the Lord, in order to assert his full right of dominion, strictly enjoin what he wishes us to do, and at once reject all human devices which are at variance with his command. Justly, too, does he, in express terms, define our limits, that we may not by fabricating perverse modes of worship, provoke His anger against us. I know how difficult it is to persuade the world that God disapproves of all modes of worship not expressly sanctioned by His Word. The opposite persuasion which cleaves to them, being seated, as it were, in their bones and marrow, is, that whatever they do, has in itself, a sufficient sanction, provided it exhibits some kind of zeal for the honour of God. But since God not only regards as fruitless, but also plainly abominates, whatever we undertake from zeal to His worship, if at variance with His command, what do we gain by a contrary course? The words of God are clear and distinct, "Obedience is better than sacrifice." "In vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men." (1 Samuel 15:22; Matt 15:9) Every addition to His word, especially in this matter, is a lie. Mere "will-worship" is vanity. This is the decision, and when once the judge has decided, it is no longer time to debate. (The Necessity of Reforming the Church, pgs 16-17)
Enhanced by Zemanta

0 comments:

Post a Comment